Kaestner and Fielding: SCOTUS Implications Create Opportunities

a will and a trust

Kaestner wins, Fielding Denied: What we can learn when analyzed together. 

On June 21, 2019, in North Carolina v. Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust, Docket No. 18–457, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ruled that the residency of a beneficiary in a U.S. state alone was not sufficient nexus (connection) for a state to tax the undistributed net income of a trust. 

Many commentators have written about the case and its implications. However,  SCOTUS declining the writ of certiorari to Minnesota’s Fielding case right after deciding on Kaestner should not be overlooked.

Written by

Picture of Emily Miller

Emily Miller

Scroll to Top
alliance logo tm with spot 1

Mission Statement

Our mission is to protect, grow, and preserve family wealth through expert fiduciary service, deep technical knowledge, and a personal high-touch approach, always committed to being of service to our clients and our community.